Welcome to the ‘defensenews’ Category

Department of Defense news release : DoD announces winners of the Secretary of Defense Environmental Awards

Saturday, June 23rd, 2007

The Department of Defense announced today the winners of the 2005 Secretary of Defense Environmental Awards. A panel of judges representing federal and state agencies and public members selected the following installations and teams as the winners of the fiscal 2005 Secretary of Defense Environmental Awards:

* Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake, Calif.

Installation — Cultural Resources Management

* Fort Campbell, Ky.

Non-Industrial Installation — Environmental Quality

* Dyess Air Force Base, Texas

Team — Environmental Quality

* Fort Lewis, Wash.

Installation — Environmental Restoration

* Pyramid Lake Torpedo and Bombing Range Remediation Project Team, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District

Team — Environmental Restoration

* Marine Corps Base Hawaii

Small Installation — Natural Resources Conservation

* Camp Ripley, Minn.

Team — Natural Resources Conservation
Advertisement

* Tinker Air Force Base Pollution Prevention Team, Tinker Air Force Base, Okla.

Installation — Pollution Prevention

* C-17 Pollution Prevention Integrated Product Team, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

Team — Weapon System Acquisition

* Defense Logistics Agency Environmental Management Systems

Team — Special Recognition for Environmental Management Systems Implementation

Every year since 1962, the secretary of defense recognizes installations, teams, and individuals for outstanding achievement in environmental management, at both domestic and overseas bases, to sustain military readiness, and training and operational capabilities.

Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Kenneth Krieg officiated at a ceremony honoring the winners May 3, 2006, in the Pentagon Auditorium. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Deputy Administrator Marcus Peacock delivered the keynote address.

Department of Defense news release : DoD reports to Congress on environmental progress

Saturday, June 23rd, 2007

The Department of Defense recently released its fiscal 2005 Defense Environmental Programs Annual Report to Congress.

The report details DoD spending and performance in four major environmental program areas: conservation, environmental restoration, compliance, and pollution prevention. It is through these four programs that DoD manages its natural and cultural resources, restores contaminated lands, administers its regulatory compliance activities, and prevents hazardous materials from reaching communities on the approximately 30 million acres of land under DoD stewardship.

The annual report shows that DoD is making significant progress in several areas.

Conservation — By the end of fiscal 2005, DoD had completed approximately 86 percent of biological inventories and 88 percent of wetlands inventories, and updated 93 percent of the natural resource management plans and 68 percent of the cultural resource management plans. A biological inventory, used for management of natural resources, is an inventory of any plants and animals located on the installation to identify high-priority resources in order to develop conservation measures and guide land management practices. Wetlands inventories identify the characteristics, extent, and status of wetlands, deepwater habitats, and other wildlife habitats located on an installation.

Environmental Restoration — DoD has had a large-scale environmental restoration effort underway for nearly two decades and has met required cleanup standards at approximately 72 percent of its current and former defense properties impacted from past defense activities. In fiscal 2005 alone, DoD completed cleanup efforts at 269 sites.

Compliance — Under federal environmental laws, DoD must comply with the same federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations that apply to state and local governments and the private sector. For DoD, fiscal 2005 saw a 9 percent decline in open enforcement actions and an 8 percent decline in new enforcement actions over the same period in fiscal 2004.

Pollution Prevention — Efforts in pollution prevention are a central focus of DoD management efforts at the installation level. In fiscal 2005, DoD realized a cost savings of $159.9 million by employing integrated solid waste management practices and diverting over 55 percent of solid waste from ever entering landfills.

“DoD strives to continuously improve its environmental performance by proving itself to be a strategic environmental leader by exceeding compliance standards, improving operational efficiency, and enhancing partnerships to identify new and innovative opportunities,” said Alex Beehler, assistant deputy under secretary of defense for environment, safety, and occupational health. “Together, DoD and the components ensure the safety of human health and secure the environmental future of defense properties to maintain a safer America.”

Department of Defense news release : DoD announces 2006 Nunn-Perry Award winners

Saturday, June 23rd, 2007

The Department of Defense honored 12 corporate partnerships with the prestigious Nunn-Perry Award during the 2006 Mentor-Protege Conference held in Atlanta, Ga., March 6-9.

The award is named in honor of former Senator Sam Nunn of Georgia and former Secretary of Defense William Perry, whose sponsorship and commitment were instrumental in creating and implementing the DoD Mentor-Protege program.

Frank Ramos, director of DoD’s Office of Small Business Programs, said, “The technologies and products benefiting today’s warfighter in the field are, in part, the result of bringing small businesses into the forefront. We recognize these Mentor-Protege teams whose extraordinary efforts have exceeded their developmental plans and helped transform the DoD acquisition process.”

This year’s Nunn-Perry Award recipients are:

* AMEC Earth and Environmental Inc., Chantilly, Va., and Echota Technologies Corp., Maryville, Tenn.

* The Boeing Co., Integrated Defense Systems, St. Louis, Mo., and Kemco Manufacturing, St. Louis, Mo.

* The Boeing Co., Integrated Defense Systems, St. Louis, Mo., and Precision Machine & Manufacturing, Grove, Okla.

* Earth Tech Inc., Richmond, Va., and ETI Professionals Inc., Lakewood, Colo.

* Lockheed Martin Maritime Systems & Sensors-Undersea Systems, Manassas, Va., and M & M Technical Services Inc., Woodbridge, Va.

* Northrop Grumman Space Technology, Redondo Beach, Calif., and KW Microwave Corp., Carlsbad, Calif..

* Raytheon Aircraft Co., Wichita, Kan., and Product Manufacturing Co., Wichita, Kan.

* Science Applications International Corp., Oak Ridge, Tenn., and Arrowhead Contracting Inc., Overland Park, Kan.

* Science Applications International Corp., Oak Ridge, Tenn., and Ellis Environmental Group, L.C., Newberry, Fla.

* Shaw Environmental Inc., Concord, Calif., and Engineering/Remediation Resources Group, Inc., Concord, Calif.

* Tetra Tech EC Inc., San Diego, Calif., and T N & Associates, Inc., Milwaukee, Wis.

* General Dynamics C4 Systems, Taunton, Mass., and CDP Fastener Group Inc., Brockton, Mass.

Defense Logistics Agency news release : IDE/GTN convergence improves logistics/transportation visibility

Saturday, June 23rd, 2007

FORT BELVOIR, Va. — Increased logistics information sharing across the Department of Defense, improved reliability and responsiveness for data exchange needs, and enhanced materiel visibility are among the benefits customers can expect from a new program management partnership recently announced by U.S. Transportation Command and the Defense Logistics Agency. The partnership will integrate defense supply chain-, logistics-, transportation-, and distribution-related data and information technology services.

A new program office has been established to unify logistics/distribution/transportation visibility efforts between DLA’s Integrated Data Environment (IDE) initiative and USTRANSCOM’s Global Transportation Network (GTN) program, with the goal of eliminating redundancy, streamlining access to data, and optimizing resources.

The convergence of the two programs will provide common integrated data services to assist development of applications that will give combatant commands, the Services, DoD, and other federal agencies a cohesive solution to manage supply chain, distribution, and logistics information. Convergence will provide a single point of systems data integration within and between DLA and USTRANSCOM and other systems; ensure consistent access to common, authoritative logistics data and business rules; and provide reliable information for DLA and USTRANSCOM and their customers.

To smooth the integration process, both programs have been placed under a single program executive officer, David Falvey, at DLA. The program manager is Army Lt. Col. Pat Flanders at USTRANSCOM. Flanders is currently leading a 90-day technical analysis to evaluate and recommend the best approach to deliver these capabilities. After the analysis, the DLA/USTRANSCOM team will jointly develop the strategy for delivering the necessary data sharing and systems to provide this needed end-to-end capability.

Department of Defense news release : Standardization Program presents annual Achievement Awards

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

Two individuals and three teams have received awards from the Defense Standardization Program Office (DSPO) for outstanding contributions to the Department of Defense last fiscal year. The awards were presented on May 23, during a ceremony in Arlington, Va.

Since 1987, DSPO has recognized individuals and organizations that have effected significant improvements in quality, reliability, readiness, cost reduction, and interoperability through standardization. The mission is to identify, influence, develop, manage, and provide access to standardization processes, products, and services for warfighters and the acquisition and logistics communities. In addition, the program promotes interoperability and assists in reducing total ownership costs and in sustaining readiness.

Following are the Defense Standardization Program recipients for 2005:

Individuals

* Dr. Jose-Luis Sagripanti, U.S. Army’s Edgewood Chemical Biological Center laboratory, developed a quantitative three-step method for determining the sporicidal efficacy of liquids, liquid sprays, and vapor or gases on contaminated carrier surfaces. This method addresses the long-standing need for a proven test method to assess products and procedures used for decontamination and disinfection (DECON) and provides a standardized and validated test to ensure that the military services select DECON products and practices, affording adequate protection to their personnel.

* Andreas Pappas, Defense Information Systems Agency, led an effort on UHF SATCOM waveform standards and technology insertion to mitigate the tactical satellite shortfall. Efforts were initiated to provide systems enhancements that will more than double the present UHF SATCOM systems capacity. Implementing integrated wavelength standards into deployed software-programmable radios will provide tremendous operational and economic benefits for the warfighter.

Teams

* The Navy’s Virginia Class Submarine Program team (PMS450) achieved tremendous savings by turning to standardization initiatives to help reduce overall acquisition and operation and maintenance costs of the program. The use of standardization succeeded in minimizing the program’s overall logistics footprint, as well as reducing the class parts library. By investing $27 million in parts standardization, the projected cost avoidance over the life of the Virginia Class program is estimated to be approximately $789 million. Members are David Restifo, James Conklin, and Jimmy Smith.

* The Navy’s Aircraft Wiring Support Equipment Commodity Program team developed the Aircraft Wiring Information System. This comprehensive database allows the standardization of repair tooling, specifications, and processes across all Navy and Marine Corps aircraft. The team’s standardization efforts have reduced the proliferation of tools and support equipment and realized a total cost avoidance of $15.9 million. Members are Gail Edwards, William Peck, Leah Boise, Robert Petrie, and Benjamin Yearwood.

* The Air Force’s Community Sensor Model (CSM) Program Team developed a CSM Interface that eliminated proprietary, technical, and political barriers across all DoD reconnaissance systems. As a result of this work, the CSM interface became an emerging standard through the DoD IT Standards Registry Technical Working Group. With more than 21 models created and four more in development, armed forces operators will be able to measure target quality coordinates at one-third the cost of previous systems. Members are Air Force Capt. Ricardo Garcia, and Lea Gordon.

Additional information on the Defense Standardization Program, this year’s awardees, and their accomplishments may be obtained by visiting the DSP Web site at .

Lt. Gen. Eikenberry Holds Defense Department News Briefing

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

PEAKERS: LIEUTENANT GENERAL KARL EIKENBERRY (USA), COMMANDER, COMBINED FORCES COMMAND IN AFGHANISTAN

BRYAN WHITMAN, DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR PUBLIC AFFAIRS

[*]

WHITMAN: Good morning and welcome.

I think you’re all familiar with Lieutenant General Karl Eikenberry. He’s the commanding general of the Combined Forces Command in Afghanistan. He’s here to give you an operational assessment and talk about the progress to date and some of the upcoming challenges in Afghanistan.

He was last here, I think, in May, when he talked to you and we’re fortunate to have him today. He actually is a little bit under the weather, but he wanted to keep this appointment and we may have to keep it short if he starts to not feel too well. But he did want to meet with you and we’re glad that he’s here today.

Thank you.

EIKENBERRY: Good morning.

I’m in Washington this week to brief the department and congressional leaders on our ongoing efforts in Afghanistan and I thought it was important to give you an update as well.

As I told you when I was here in May, the progress we’re making in Afghanistan is significant, especially when viewed from the baseline, October of 2001, when we first began Operation Enduring Freedom.

But against this progress, Afghanistan remains the target of international terrorists, militant extremists, drug traffickers and a determined criminal element.

The enemy we face today in the field is not extremely strong. Their influence has grown in some areas in the south and southeast where the presence of the government of Afghanistan has never been strong.

In some areas there are more Taliban extremists than there were at this point last year. And within some areas they are demonstrated better command and control and they’re fighting harder.

They remain an enemy as well that is not bound by international borders, and poses a common threat to all nations within the region.

The challenge that we face is not one of a military nature. The coalition, NATO and Afghan national security forces dominate wherever they encounter the enemy.

The critical task at this stage is strengthening the government of Afghanistan, developing the economy and helping to build Afghan civil society.

However, NATO and U.S.-led coalition and Afghan national security forces are moving aggressively to deny the enemy safe havens, to interdict his movement routes and, most importantly, to extend the authority of the central government.

The combat phase of the coalition’s current operation, Operation Mountain Fury in southeastern Afghanistan, is only the precursor to our longer-term goal of strengthening governance, establishing the rule of law and facilitating reconstruction and economic development.

This emphasis on government and development is the centerpiece of coalition and NATO’s overall approach to the Afghan campaign.

Provincial reconstruction teams are actively engaging district and provincial leaders to facilitate good governance. Medical assistant teams are treating thousands of Afghans who, otherwise, would not have access to medical care. And we are building hundreds of miles of roads.

These roads, along with schools, bridges, wells, health clinics and other reconstruction we are providing, are the heart of our long- term effort to rebuild Afghanistan’s middle ground, that is its civil society that’s been ravaged by three decades of brutal warfare, extremism and terrorism.

In a campaign such as this, the construction of roads and schools can be just as decisive, if not more, than military actions. The international community must make greater efforts in this area.

EIKENBERRY: The Afghan national security forces are a key part of this effort to restore the middle ground. Today over 76,000 army and police are trained, equipped and engaged in security operations.

While still lacking sufficient capability, they’re increasingly playing a major role in ensuring the stability of their nation, as evidenced by their successful participation in Operations Mountain Lion and Mountain Thrust, earlier this year, and in NATO’s Operation Medusa, just completed, and in the ongoing coalition Operation Mountain Fury.

It’s imperative here, too, that the international community maintain its support and commitment to these essential but still emerging institutions of the Afghan state.

Finally, the coalition continues to work toward a seamless transfer of authority in Regional Command East to NATO International Security Assistance Force.

The coalition transferred Regional Command South to NATO on July the 31st. And we anticipate turning over Regional Command East to NATO later this year.

A key point to remember in this transition is that the United States maintains its full commitment in Afghanistan. It will be undiminished. As a NATO member, the United States will remain by far the single largest contributor of troops and military capability.

We will maintain our strong national capability in support of counterterrorism missions to strike Al Qaida and its associated movements wherever and whenever they are found.

Department of Defense News Release : general officer announcement

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld announced that the president has nominated:

Lt. Gen. Robert Wilson, U.S. Army, for assignment as assistant chief of staff for installation management/commanding general, Installation Management Command, U.S. Army, Washington, D.C. He is currently serving as assistant chief of staff for installation management, U.S. Army, Washington, DC.

Department of Defense News Release : DoD announces maintenance award winners

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

The Department of Defense announced today the annual winners of the Secretary of Defense Maintenance Awards, the Phoenix, and the Robert T. Mason Trophies recognizing excellence in field and depot-level maintenance.

The field-level maintenance awards honor military maintenance organizations for outstanding performance. The awardees–two from each category of small, medium, and large organizations–are chosen from active and reserve organizations that perform unit- or field-level maintenance. One of those organizations is singled out as the best of the best and receives the Phoenix Trophy.

2006 Phoenix Award

The 2006 winner of the Phoenix Award for field level maintenance is the 3rd Materiel Readiness Battalion, III Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF). Based in Okinawa, this battalion serves the entire III MEF. In fiscal year 2005, III MEF units deployed in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom, and various training exercises and humanitarian relief efforts. Despite supporting so many diverse missions, the battalion completed more than 13,500 intermediate repair orders in an average repair cycle time of 27.8 days, resulting in III MEF having an overall ground combat equipment readiness of greater than 95 percent.

Secretary of Defense Maintenance Awards

The other field-level maintenance organizations receiving Secretary of Defense Maintenance Awards are: Helicopter Anti-submarine Squadron Light 47, Helicopter Maritime Strike Wing for the Navy and 303rd Intelligence Squadron, Air Combat Command for the Air Force in the small category; the 297th Transportation Company, 2nd Chemical Battalion for the Army, and the 437th Maintenance Squadron/315th Maintenance Squadron (Reserve), Air Mobility Command for the Air Force in the medium category; and 3rd Maintenance Group, 3rd Wing for the Air Force in the large category.

Robert T. Mason Trophy

The Secretary of Defense Maintenance Award for depot-level maintenance, the Robert T Mason Trophy, is presented to the major organic depot-level maintenance facility that exemplifies responsive and effective depot-level support to DoD operating units. It is named after a former assistant deputy secretary of defense for maintenance policy, programs, and resources, who served as a champion for excellence in organic depot maintenance operations.

The 2006 winner of the Robert T. Mason Trophy is the High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle Recapitalization Program at Red River Army Depot, Texas. Through this program, the Red River Army Depot restored nearly 2,800 primarily battle-damaged HMMWVs, exceeding planned output by 33 percent, while reducing average defects by 46 percent, shortening repair cycle time by 45 percent and lowering the average cost by 42 percent. Its workload for fiscal year 2006 consisted of 3,500 HMMWVs, a 26 percent increase over the year before.

These awards were presented Oct. 25 at the 2006 DoD Maintenance Symposium and Exhibition in Reno, Nev.

Department of Defense News Release : Department of Defense civilian awards presentations announced

Friday, June 22nd, 2007

Today Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England presented two categories of distinguished civilian awards: the 51 st annual DoD Distinguished Civilian Service Awards and the 2nd annual DoD David O. Cooke Excellence in Public Administration Award. The Pentagon ceremony was hosted by Director, Administration and Management Michael B. Donley.

The DoD David O. Cooke Excellence in Public Administration Award recognizes a DoD employee with from three to 10 years of federal service and occupies a non-managerial DoD position who exhibits great potential as a federal executive. This employee must emulate Cooke’s dedication to service and spirit of cooperation and improvement in the department. The recipient of this year’s award was Lorena Castro, project engineer, Program Executive Office (Ships), Department of the Navy. Castro was responsible for the development of the acquisition and contracting strategy for procuring three research ships for the National Science Foundation.

The DoD Distinguished Civilian Service Award is the highest DoD-level award that a career civil servant can earn. It recognizes career employees for exceptional contributions to the DoD. The following received this award:

TANGLED UP IN KHAKI AND BLUE: LETHAL AND NON-LETHAL WEAPONS IN RECENT CONFRONTATIONS

Wednesday, June 20th, 2007

“I helped her out of a jam, I guess, but I used a little loo much force.”

Bob Dylan, “Tangled Up in Blue” 1974

I. INTRODUCTION

The governmental mechanisms that exercise a state’s physical coercive power-various cadres of military and law enforcement agencies-often face a difficult dilemma. In confrontations with recalcitrant opposing forces, the authorities must recognize that if they exercise too much power, they incur an unacceptable danger of “collateral damage,” unintended casualties to civilians and unnecessary destruction of valuable property. On the other hand, if they exercise too little power, they may risk the safety of their own personnel and compromise the accomplishment of an important and legitimate mission.

In recent years, this dilemma has arisen with painful frequency inside the United States and elsewhere. Officials increasingly express frustration at having only an impoverished array of tools at their disposal, especially regarding confrontations in which the specific target of the police or military forces is intermingled with civilians or innocent bystanders. Government actors may have only “bullhorns or bullets” to choose from; if emphatic verbal instructions and warnings do not suffice, the only recourse official forces have is the application of deadly force, which often cannot be applied with anything like the desired surgical precision.

This Article presents that dilemma in the context of the imminent development of a novel toolkit of so-called “non-lethal weapons” (NLW), which promise to radically alter the existing Hobson’s choice. These armaments-a wide range of technologies, new and old, incorporating different types of physical mechanisms, capable of both anti-personnel and anti-materiel operations-seek to provide a viable intermediate capability, for the first time affording governmental actors additional options in volatile situations. These emerging capabilities include a breathtaking array of devices such as enhancements of the traditional “rubber bullets”; foam sprays that make a surface either impossibly slippery or impassively sticky; millimeter wave “heat rays” that peacefully repel people without inflicting lasting harm; projectile netting or other entangling devices to capture individuals or vehicles; chemicals that temporarily irritate, repel, or becalm a person; biological agents that embrittle metal or contaminate petroleum products; and many more.

This Article examines three representative recent confrontations: the 1993 shootout and siege at Waco, Texas, involving federal ATF and FBI units against the Branch Davidians led by millennialist David Koresh; the 2002 seizure of the Dubrovka Theater in Moscow by Chechen separatists; and the 2003 Gulf War II fighting by the British Army against indigenous resistance in Basra, Iraq. Although in each of these episodes government forces “prevailed” in some crude sense, each was at least partially unsatisfactory, resulting in more carnage and more destruction than anyone would have wanted. Therefore, the goal of this Article is to determine whether the availability of a richer configuration of non-lethal weapons might have made a difference.

These three case studies provide an array of contrasts: they occurred on three different continents, they involved three different countries and three different types of resistance units as protagonists, and they engaged notably different genres of armaments and tactics. In addition, the three selected incidents are usefully diverse in yet another regard. The first, Waco, was clearly a law enforcement operation, initially occasioned by the effort to serve ordinary arrest and search warrants. In contrast, the third, Basra, was plainly a conventional military operation, occurring in the midst of a broad-gauged international armed conflict. The second, Moscow, presents a sort of middle ground, containing aspects of both law enforcement and military counter-terrorism operations, thereby illuminating the rainbow of legal and policy considerations at play.

This Article does not argue that non-lethal weapons shouldhave been applied in these confrontations, or that they necessarily would have made a profound difference in resolving the clashes at appreciably less cost. It may be that these instances were simply intractable, that the opposing forces were so resistant, fanatic, or entrenched that even improved technology and tactics would have proven unavailing. Still, the hypothetical inquiry remains: in these three tragic cases, what might have happened if the respective governments had been able to try something else-something non-lethal?

The Article proceeds in the following steps. First, Section II surveys the emerging world of non-lethal weapons, beginning with the observation that the very name “non-lethal” is at least partially misleading; any application of force by police or military units inherently carries the potential for death. Although this new family of technologies at least attempts to reduce greatly the probability of mortality and widespread destruction of property, it offers no absolute guarantees.